|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like the Goddamn Internet |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
James Martin's strange paintings make him the Martin Luther of the art world. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| "Painting
is just another virtual reality," James Martin has said, "like
the goddamn Internet." His paintings especially, crowded with endless
references that are alternately turned around and twisted or served straight,
either dropped uncomfortably in a scene like an elephant in the room, or
tucked in the corner to be easily ignored, are full to overflowing with
the essential, the superfluous and the insane. One walks away from Martin's
paintings with a similar feeling one has surfing away from an odd discovery
on the Web: "Why the hell would anyone make that?"
And that's the point, sort of. Early on in his 40-plus-year career, Martin was a rising star in the art world, part of the school known as "the mystic painters of the Northwest," abstract painters informed more by metaphysical concerns than by the intellect. But Martin's was a funhouse metaphysic. His debut came in 1955 when, in a multi-artist exhibition featuring serious paintings with titles like "Moon over Water Hemlock" and "Lunar Pines," Martin showed a work called "Radio Active Rat." Martin may
be a mystic, but he never gets too serious about transcendance. Religious
imagery literally dances through his paintings (see the toe-tapping holy
man in "Aging Hero, Dancing Monk") but never as a sign of holier-than-thou
earnestness. For Martin, the only sacred cow is the one floating in "Cow
on Ceiling of First Baptist Church." But he's not trying to merely
make fun of mysticism. He's seeking enlightenment by way of burlesque.
(See "J. on the Astrowagon" for directions.) The visual puns,
absurd juxtapositions, and straight up sight gags are Martin's means of
killing the Buddhas of the high art world that stand in his way. Which can be a serious business, after all. There's a political edge to Martin's vaudeville mysticism. The point then and now is to question the authority and legitimacy of the very art world that gives painters their authority and legitimacy. According to the critic Sheila Farr, Martin "sees the commercial art game for what it is: a Daliesque creation held up by little props and crutches, an artificial construct whose systematically escalating prices, like a Sunday sermon, reassure collectors that they are on the right path." Having entered this game, Martin plays by subverting all the rules: he floods the market with his work; he gives away scraps, sketches and false-starts; he paints fast and carelessly, filling canvases with images that can be seen as either icons or clichés: Lone Rangers, master artists, mad monks, lions, tigers and bears Oh my. The daffiness of so much of his work makes you wonder if Martin's studio is a padded room. Which brings us back to the question: Why would anyone in his right mind -- especially one who seems on some level to disdain the very making of art -- make this stuff? Think of it this way: there's no more fervent believer than a heretic. And there's no better heresy than a good joke. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Holly Berman writes often about cooking, art and tent making. She lives in the Pacific Northwest. Images featured are from James Martin: Art Rustler at the Rivoli, introduced by Sheila Farr. Museum of Northwest Art, in association with University of Washington Press, 2001. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||